SKILLEMALL.ai

BC agent-publish

Agent 发布/更新到 ClawHub + GitHub 的标准技能。 当 agent 的核心文件(SOUL.md/AGENTS.md/IDENTITY.md/TOOLS.md)发生变更时,自动询问是否发布更新。 触发场景:agent 内容更新完成时、用户要求发布/推送/更新到 ClawHub/GitHub、用户说"发布"、"推送"、"publish"、"push"。 必须在所有 agent workspace 中作为基础技能加载。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: perrykono-debug v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 613 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 30 h ago

Agent 发布/更新到 ClawHub + GitHub 的标准技能。 当 agent 的核心文件(SOUL.md/AGENTS.md/IDENTITY.md/TOOLS.md)发生变更时,自动询问是否发布更新。 触发场景:agent 内容更新完成时、用户要求发布/推送/更新到…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 28 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 613 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 219: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill appears to be a publishing helper, but its activation and loading scope are too broad for a workflow that can publish content externally.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 6 Jun 2026