SKILLEMALL.ai

BD 产业投资分析师 (Industrial Investment Analyst)

一级市场产业投资分析 Agent,模拟头部 VC/PE/产业资本/政府引导基金的投资决策逻辑。 V1.2.0 版本,包含:五大分析层(Founder/Industry/Government/Financial/Industrial Capability)+ 数据获取 Checklist、三个决策引擎(Deal Killer/Missing Information/Confidence)、IC Debate Engine、Comps Analysis Engine(项目对比)、Sensitivity Analysis(敏感性分析)、Analysis History(历史记录)、Export Engine(多格式报告)、xbrowser 集成(企查查/招聘数据)。 特别针对中国市场设计 Government Layer,适配地方国资基金、产业资本投资决策。 触发场景:项目投资分析、赛道研究、创始人评估、投资决策、产业投资分析、地方政府招商评估、竞品对比、多项目并排分析、报告导出。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: perrykono-debug v1.2.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 653 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 30 h ago

一级市场产业投资分析 Agent,模拟头部 VC/PE/产业资本/政府引导基金的投资决策逻辑。 V1.2.0 版本,包含:五大分析层(Founder/Industry/Government/Financial/Industrial Capability)+ 数据获取 Checklist、三个决策引擎(Deal…

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
82/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-agent-memory-dump references/identity.md
    Agent memory / workspace files bundled with the skill (2) — likely a workspace dump with personal data or tokens
    references/identity.md, references/soul.md

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (产业投资分析师 (Industrial Investment Analyst)) differs from the folder (vc-analyst)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 31 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 653 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -44 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 444: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a legitimate investment-analysis skill, but it automatically stores and reuses potentially confidential deal analysis without clear user consent or retention controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jun 2026