SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC twitter-autopilot

Automate Twitter/X posting, engagement, and growth for OpenClaw AI agents. Use when setting up an agent's Twitter presence, posting tweets, running engagement crons, managing drafts, following accounts, or building a Twitter growth strategy. Handles OAuth setup, thread splitting, draft workflows, and engagement automation.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: persnola1-sketch v1.3.1 5 files body ≈ 1 193 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

IntegrationAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 33 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1193 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 324: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill matches its Twitter automation purpose, but it needs review because it can use live OAuth credentials to post, delete, and follow autonomously with weak guardrails.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026