AC openclaw-route-audit
Use static route analysis plus runtime cron delivery audit to validate OpenClaw cron notification wiring. Use when auditing cron jobs, announce routing, silent notification failures, sessionKey/target mismatches, ambiguous channel:last usage, or when preparing a ClawHub/GitHub-publishable skill around openclaw-route-check. Repository: https://github.com/pfrederiksen/openclaw-route-check
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:86Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- no privilege escalation
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Use static route analysis plus runtime cron delivery audit to vali… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 45 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 834 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 389: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.