BD launchranked-seo
Technical SEO and AI-search (GEO) playbook for improving a website from its own codebase, using LaunchRanked's live checks. Use when the user wants to improve SEO, rank on Google, get cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude or Google AI Overviews, fix titles, meta descriptions, canonicals, sitemaps, robots.txt, structured data (JSON-LD), llms.txt, broken links or page speed, audit their site, or plan a product launch and directory submissions for backlinks.
Technical SEO and AI-search (GEO) playbook for improving a website from its own codebase, using LaunchRanked's live checks.
As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: url
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: url
Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: url
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 41 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2361 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 458: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
- +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.