SKILLEMALL.ai

AB music-identify

Identify songs from audio clips using AudD API and optionally queue them to Spotify. Triggers on /songsearch command, voice messages with song identification intent, or when user asks "what song is this." Also handles recall queries like "what did I shazam" or "what was that song" by reading the music log. Works with any audio file (OGG, MP3, WAV, etc.).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: PlayOffP v1.2.0 MIT-0 6 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 1 173 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
99/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
99
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
73/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Tools and files w 18
60
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Exfiltration net-credential-use scripts/identify.sh:27
      Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      response="$(curl -sS -F "file=@${audio_path}" -F "api_token=${api_key}" -F "return=spotify" https://api.audd.io/ || true)"
      vendor-hostquoted

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 27 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1173 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 356: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 99.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill mostly matches its music-identification purpose, but the optional Spotify integration has security and privacy issues users should review before installing.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026