BF 金字塔记忆架构
通用 AI Agent 记忆架构 Skill。采用"金字塔"分层结构:顶层(AGENTS.md)只放铁律级行为规则,中层(MEMORY.md/SOUL.md/HEARTBEAT.md)放业务规则和人格配置,底层(SKILL.md/TOOLS.md)放技术实现细节。适用于所有新建子 Agent 工作区初始化。触发场景:创建新 Agent、初始化工作区、记忆架构设计、规则录入引导、md 文件冗余检查、触发机制职责划分、任务归属标记检查、cron锚点格式检查、cron复杂度分级。
As a process F 28/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/*.js, templates/AGENTS.md, templates/MEMORY.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/*.js - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/AGENTS.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/MEMORY.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/SOUL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/IDENTITY.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/USER.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/TOOLS.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/HEARTBEAT.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 28/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/*.js, templates/AGENTS.md, templates/MEMORY.md
- 0Tools and files. 8 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/*.js, templates/AGENTS.md, templates/MEMORY.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (金字塔记忆架构) differs from the folder (pyramid-memory-architecture)
- 100Steps. 82 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3423 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -225 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 239: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 26 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 82 items
- +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 53.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a coherent memory-architecture guide, but it includes broad workspace scanning, file rewriting/deletion guidance, cron setup, and GitHub push steps with inconsistent confirmation boundaries.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 6 Aug 2026