SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AA intelligence-desk-brief

Generate a portfolio-aware daily or on-demand risk analysis brief from public market data, company updates, earnings material, and macro context, then emit a host-consumable handoff for persistence. Every brief should open by restating the user's portfolio or watchlist and the industries or themes they care about, then explain what changed, which exposures matter, and what to make of it.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: prashamshah115 v1.0.2 MIT-0 52 files body ≈ 1 976 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process A 82/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: consistency, running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
A
82/100
Runs to the end
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Consistency w 8
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security README.md:72
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - host-oriented Notion handoff payload generation

    Files scanned: 37. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requires"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "config"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "examples"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 82/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (intelligence-desk-brief) differs from the folder (portfolio-risk-desk)
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 74 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1976 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 390: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 74 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill largely matches its portfolio-briefing purpose, but it should be reviewed because live mode can use an Apify token to create, update, or delete remote scraping tasks and can persist or share portfolio context.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026