SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC claudebox

Install, configure, or run Claude Code through the claudebox wrapper, or connect to its HTTP, MCP, Telegram, or cron surfaces.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Ciprian Mandache v2.5.1 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 6 454 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 7 d ago

Install, configure, or run Claude Code through the claudebox wrapper, or connect to its HTTP, MCP, Telegram, or cron surfaces.

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureTelegramDockerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
81/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
85
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Exfiltration medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".

For the author

If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 3

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 3
  • medium Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:419
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)
    RUN_ID=$(curl -s -X POST http://loca…080/run -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  • medium Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:422
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)
    until curl -s "http://loca…080/run/result?runId=…" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" | jq -e '.status != "running"' >/dev/null; do
  • medium Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:425
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)
    curl -s "http://loca…080/run/result?runId=…" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" | jq

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6454 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 154, 219): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 31 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6454 tokens
  • 100Steps. 24 steps
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 126: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
  • +4Has examples (26 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill clearly documents a powerful Claude-in-Docker setup, but its default wrapper and server modes can grant broad file, Docker, credential, and background-task authority that users should review carefully before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 10 Oct 2026