AF servicepack
Build a Go service on psyb0t/servicepack — clone-and-own framework (not a `go get` library) providing a Service interface (Name/Run/Stop), a singleton ServiceManager that runs services concurrently with dependency-ordered topological start, automatic retry (Retryable), non-fatal failures (AllowedFailure), readiness gating (ReadyNotifier), per-service CLI subcommands (Commander), an App singleton with OnPreRun/OnPostStop lifecycle hooks, gofindimpl-based service auto-discovery codegen, ctxscope/slogging structured logging, and a graceful-shutdown Runner. Import path github.com/psyb0t/servicepack. Use when the user wants related Go services debugged together locally, then deployed as one binary or split into separate microservices, with retry/dependency/readiness semantics.
Build a Go service on psyb0t/servicepack — clone-and-own framework (not a go get library) providing a Service interface (Name/Run/Stop), a singleton…
As a process F 43/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/make/servicepack/
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/make/servicepack/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "permissions"
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/make/servicepack/
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 13 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2177 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 782: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.