AF essay-writing
Chinese argumentative essay and op-ed writing skill. Produces polished content for Zhihu (知乎), WeChat Official Accounts (公众号), Xiaohongshu (小红书), and Douyin (抖音). This skill should be used when users ask to write argumentative essays, social commentary, opinion pieces, Zhihu answers, public account articles, RED notes, or short-video scripts. Not suitable for pure narrative (fiction/novels), formal academic papers, official documents, press releases, or slide copy.
Chinese argumentative essay and op-ed writing skill.
As a process F 48/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: assets/user_profile_template.md, references/platform_adaptation.md, references/writing_techniques.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/user_profile_template.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/platform_adaptation.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/writing_techniques.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/anti_ai_voice.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/thinking_toolkit.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: assets/user_profile_template.md, references/platform_adaptation.md, references/writing_techniques.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (essay-writing) differs from the folder (writing-essey-skills)
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Failures and branches. 6 branches
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4870 tokens
- 100Steps. 96 steps
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 469: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 18 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 96 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.