SKILLEMALL.ai

BC xiaozhi-cornell-notes

把课堂笔记整理成能被再次用上的形式:左栏线索问题 + 右栏内容 + 底部一句话总结,并按学科课题归档。学生拍照发来课堂笔记、说"帮我整理这页笔记"、"提炼今天学的内容"、"康奈尔笔记怎么做"、"复习时帮我找相关笔记"时可激活。它只做笔记的整理、归档与调取,以及(开启档案后、学生要求时)一份笔记使用情况报告——哪些笔记被调取过、哪些从没用过;开启跨 SKILL 共享后,只把笔记数量与反复出现的缺口这两项汇总写进学习DNA 的 extensions.notes,不传笔记全文;复习提醒只在学生同意时经 IM 提醒发送。不讲新知识(转对应学科教练)、不分析错题(转错题本)、不验证理解(转费曼学习法);自测的回忆状态只在会话内用,不留存。

ClawHub Hermes author: 小智伴学 v2.1.12 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 1 650 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

把课堂笔记整理成能被再次用上的形式:左栏线索问题 + 右栏内容 +…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

Proceduretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-long-hermes description is 318 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • warning description-no-when neither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "grade_bands"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "depends_on"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 4 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1650 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 318: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 4 items
  • +4Has examples (22 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a legitimate Cornell-note organizer, but it should be reviewed because its cross-skill sharing contract can allow more note data than the skill promises to share.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 7 Sept 2026