SKILLEMALL.ai

BC xiaozhi-skill-coordinator

学习系统协调器:判断一次学习问题该由哪个 SKILL 接手,并在用户请求时汇总全景月报。学生说“帮我生成全景月报”“我的学习系统运转得好吗”“这道题该找谁分析”“这周该先补哪一环”时可激活。它不自己讲题、不自己分析错因、不自己出题、不发提醒——只做路由、去重与汇总;周报归每周学习复盘。仅在当前任务需要且用户已同意相关数据使用时按最小必要字段汇总,不做跨SKILL全量拉取或写回。

ClawHub Hermes author: 小智伴学 v2.1.12 MIT-0 16 files body ≈ 2 290 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

学习系统协调器:判断一次学习问题该由哪个 SKILL…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

Proceduretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-long-hermes description is 190 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • warning description-no-when neither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "grade_bands"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "depends_on"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 21 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2290 tokens
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 190: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 28 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
  • +4Has examples (17 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a legitimate learning coordinator, but its student-data handover schema is broader than the coordinator role and needs review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 7 Sept 2026