BC xiaozhi-teach-english-listening-designer
英语听力教学设计：把"放一遍录音对答案"变成有目标、有策略、有微技能训练的听力课。触发语："听力课怎么上"、"听力材料选什么"、"学员听不懂"、"听力策略怎么教"、"听力微技能怎么练"、"精听泛听怎么分"、"听填信息怎么训练"。核心工作流：听力目标 → 材料选编（来源/难度/版权）→ 听前预测 → 听中分层 → 听后任务 → 微技能训练 → 写回班级工作空间。题型按中考听力四节结构排。不处理：整卷四维测评的设计与能力画像（转英语综合测评）、口语活动与纠错策略（转英语口语活动设计）、通用命题的难度与区分度分析（转 xiaozhi-teach-exam-designer）。
英语听力教学设计：把"放一遍录音对答案"变成有目标、有策略、有微技能训练的听力课。触发语："听力课怎么上"、"听力材料选什么"、"学员听不懂"、"听力策略怎么教"、"听力微技能怎么练"、"精听泛听怎么分"、"听填信息怎么训练"。核心工作流：听力目标 → 材料选编（来源/难度/版权）→ 听前预测 → 听中分层 →…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 288 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
description-no-whenneither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "grade_bands" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "depends_on" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "id" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "min_platform_version" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "max_round_limit" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 26 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3330 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 288: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 42 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +4Has examples (26 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.