BC xiaozhi-weekly-review
把一周零散的学习记录整理成有结论、有证据、有下一步的周报，并带学生做一次自我复盘。学生说“帮我生成周报”“这周学习复盘”“总结一下这周”“下周重点是什么”时可激活；说“这个月怎么样”的转学习系统协调器。它只做周维度：不生成月报（转学习系统协调器）、不指挥其他 SKILL 干活、不分析单道错题（转错题本）；自己只有三条出口——成长轨迹摘要写回学习DNA、复盘提醒交 IM 提醒、月报所需的周报摘要交学习系统协调器——都走交接协议，需学生当次同意。家庭版需要学生授权后才生成，学生可以否决。
把一周零散的学习记录整理成有结论、有证据、有下一步的周报，并带学生做一次自我复盘。学生说“帮我生成周报”“这周学习复盘”“总结一下这周”“下周重点是什么”时可激活；说“这个月怎么样”的转学习系统协调器。它只做周维度：不生成月报（转学习系统协调器）、不指挥其他 SKILL…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 244 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
description-no-whenneither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "grade_bands" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "depends_on" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 41 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1834 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 244: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 29 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.