BF chief-pitfall-officer
甲方首席防坑官。识别乙方套路、规避合作风险，输出可落地的全链路执行方案。触发：'帮我理理需求''怎么防坑''怎么落地''报价合理吗''验收标准''供应商选型'。不适用于纯技术实现或乙方内部管理。
甲方首席防坑官。识别乙方套路、规避合作风险，输出可落地的全链路执行方案。触发：'帮我理理需求''怎么防坑''怎么落地''报价合理吗''验收标准''供应商选型'。不适用于纯技术实现或乙方内部管理。
As a process F 43/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/industries/, references/industry-adaptation.md, references/participant-risk-map.md
ProcedureData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/industries/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/industry-adaptation.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/participant-risk-map.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/pricing-database.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/acceptance-standards.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/legal-financial-audit.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/industry-knowledge.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/industries/*.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/industries/<new>.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/industries/, references/industry-adaptation.md, references/participant-risk-map.md
- 0Tools and files. 9 referenced file(s) missing: references/industries/, references/industry-adaptation.md, references/participant-risk-map.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 100Steps. 87 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3116 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low The response is described with custom markup (33 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 97: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -216 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 31 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 87 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 55.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This advisory skill is not malware, but it asks the agent to automatically persist user-derived business context and use stored instructions to change future runs.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 12 Jul 2026