SKILLEMALL.ai

AC token-router

智能模型路由与Token成本优化顾问 / Smart LLM Router & Token Cost Optimizer. 帮助用户为不同复杂度的AI任务选择最合适的模型层级(从极致性价比到旗舰级), 通过任务复杂度评估、模型分级推荐、安全强制升级规则,在保证质量的前提下节省70-90%的Token成本。 同时提供Trae、OpenClaw、Hermes Agent等平台的多模型路由配置方案。 必须在以下场景触发此技能——即使用户没有直接说"帮我选模型",只要核心诉求涉及成本或模型选择: 用户觉得API费用太贵想省钱;用户想知道某个具体任务该用哪个模型;用户要配置Hermes或OpenClaw的多模型路由; 用户讨论Token消耗、API成本、模型价格对比;用户问"用GPT-4o还是Haiku""Sonnet和Opus选哪个"; 用户提到一人公司/独立开发者的AI工具成本问题;用户要搭建需要不同模型处理不同任务的Agent工作流; 用户说"帮我省钱""Token太贵""成本太高""怎么降本""API账单""模型路由""智能调度""模型分级"。 Also trigger when the user discusses: "which model should I use", "reduce API costs", "token cost optimization", "LLM routing", "model selection", "save money on AI", "cheaper model", "cost vs quality", "configure Hermes/OpenClaw multi-model routing", "model tier", "intelligent scheduling".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: qomob v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 1 673 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 55 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1673 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • medium 4 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
    • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 14 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 770: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 26 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 55 items
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This model-routing skill is not flagged as malware, but it needs review because it appears to profile conversation history and may activate on unrelated tasks without clear user controls.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 3 Jun 2026