SKILLEMALL.ai

BC cross-border-listing-optimizer

跨境电商AI上架与优化专家。支持Amazon、Etsy、TikTok Shop、 Shopify等多平台商品Listing批量生成:SEO标题、五点描述、 产品详情、关键词挖掘、A+页面文案、产品图AI提示词。 支持批量处理(一次生成100+商品),中英文双语输出。 触发词:跨境上架、Amazon listing、跨境电商、listing优化、产品描述生成。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: qq435912743 v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 804 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

跨境电商AI上架与优化专家。支持Amazon、Etsy、TikTok Shop、 Shopify等多平台商品Listing批量生成:SEO标题、五点描述、 产品详情、关键词挖掘、A+页面文案、产品图AI提示词。 支持批量处理(一次生成100+商品),中英文双语输出。 触发词:跨境上架、Amazon…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureShopifyMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name_en"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_zh"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_en"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "visibility"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 39 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 804 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 180: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The listing generator is mostly understandable, but it includes automatic persistent learning and self-modification instructions that users should review before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 14 Aug 2026