SKILLEMALL.ai

BD super-agent-integration

把分散建成的超级智能体单点能力熔成一次真实可跑、可被度量的端到端自主闭环,是超越一线大模型的最后一公里。 真实 import 并调用 planner / reason-verify / memory-cross-engine / reflection-replanner / super-agent-bootstrap / agent-eval-harness,跑通「感知→规划→执行→自验证→反思重规划→跨引擎记忆→回归评测」 全链路,最后用评测引擎量化闭环健康度并判定是否闭环可用。当用户要求真正跑通自主智能体、 验证"是否真的能端到端自主完成任务"、度量超级智能体健康度时使用。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: qq435912743 v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 624 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

把分散建成的超级智能体单点能力熔成一次真实可跑、可被度量的端到端自主闭环,是超越一线大模型的最后一公里。 真实 import 并调用 planner / reason-verify / memory-cross-engine / reflection-replanner /…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "visibility"

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 14 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 624 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 292: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The main integration runner is local and purpose-related, but the skill also adds persistent self-learning memory for preferences, errors, and notes without clear limits or consent.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 14 Aug 2026