SKILLEMALL.ai

AC prompt-engineering-expert

AI回答总是不够好?问题大概率出在你的提问方式。不是给你模板死记硬背,而是教你Role-Task-Format-CoT四大核心维度的设计原理,让你针对任何模型、任何场景都能写出高质量prompt。覆盖GPT/Claude/Gemini/国产大模型,掌握底层原理一通百通。附Prompt诊断修复表,12种常见问题一键定位。 触发词:提示词优化、写提示词、prompt工程、怎么问AI、让AI更好的回答、角色扮演prompt、Few-shot示例、思维链CoT、prompt模板、AI指令设计、提示词技巧、让AI更听话、system prompt、角色设定、AI回答不好、AI输出质量、prompt技巧、chain of thought、高质量prompt、prompt框架、结构化提问、AI控制输出格式、让AI输出JSON、prompt engineering、提示词工程师、prompt调试、AI调教、调教AI、prompt设计模式、怎么让AI输出稳定、高级prompt技巧、让AI听话的秘诀、AI输出不稳定、CoT提示词、few-shot写法、structured prompting 排除:代码生成(用编程技能)、长文本创作(用写作技能)、纯聊天

ClawHub Agent Skills author: qqyougitcom v1.4.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 419 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 33 h ago

AI回答总是不够好?问题大概率出在你的提问方式。不是给你模板死记硬背,而是教你Role-Task-Format-CoT四大核心维度的设计原理,让你针对任何模型、任何场景都能写出高质量prompt。覆盖GPT/Claude/Gemini/国产大模型,掌握底层原理一通百通。附Prompt诊断修复表,12种常见问题一键定位…

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (prompt-engineering-expert) differs from the folder (mimo-prompt-engineering-expert)
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 21 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 419 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 525: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a Markdown-only prompt-engineering guide that teaches prompt structure and does not add executable behavior or request private access.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 18 Jun 2026