SKILLEMALL.ai

BB ai-pm-intel-brief

Create a daily AI PM intelligence brief from Twitter/X or similar high-signal sources. Use when the user asks for an AI product manager news brief, signal brief, trend roundup, account digest, "今天 AI 圈在聊什么", "整理成简报", or wants recent posts from selected people/accounts summarized into: key signals, product insights, original excerpts, and links. Also use when turning raw social posts into a concise brief for product strategy, workflow design, agent products, growth, or market positioning.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: QRG-cloud v0.1.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 1 210 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorInfrastructureWriting and documentsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Create a daily AI PM intelligence brief from Twitter/X or similar … ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 82 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1210 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 492: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 82 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a low-risk briefing skill that summarizes public AI product-management signals, with only minor routing and language-template caveats.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026