SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC ssh-vault

Execute SSH commands on remote hosts via SSH Vault MCP. Use when: user asks to run commands on vault-managed hosts, or when in a Discord channel mapped to a vault host. NOT for: hosts with direct SSH access or openclaw nodes. Ask user for their vault URL if not known. Requires env vars: SSH_VAULT_URL (vault endpoint), SSH_VAULT_AGENT_PRIVATE_KEY and SSH_VAULT_AGENT_PUBLIC_KEY (Ed25519 agent keypair for request signing). The private key is used only for signing vault API requests — never reuse keys tied to other services.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Quentin So v1.0.2 4 files body ≈ 601 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationDiscordDockerAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 13 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 601 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 526: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is for real remote SSH command execution and mostly discloses that, but it asks for broad host access and caches approval sessions in a weak location.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026