BB browser-automation
Vision-driven browser automation using Midscene. Operates from screenshots — no DOM or accessibility labels needed. Runs in headless Puppeteer — does NOT take over the user's mouse or keyboard. Also supports CDP mode and Bridge mode to connect to an existing Chrome. Use this skill when the user wants to: - Browse, navigate, or open web pages - Scrape, extract, or collect data from websites - Fill out forms, click buttons, or interact with web elements - Verify, validate, test, or QA frontend UI behavior - Take screenshots of web pages - Automate multi-step web workflows - Test what was just built, see if it works in browser - Connect to Chrome via CDP, DevTools Protocol, or remote debugging - Connect to user's Chrome browser, control my browser, operate my Chrome Powered by Midscene.js (https://midscenejs.com)
As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, consistency, running it twice
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Bash
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (browser-automation) differs from the folder (midscene-computer-browser)
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4051 tokens
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 39 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 8 branches, has a failure section
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 824: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 27 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
- +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.