SKILLEMALL.ai

BD cortex-protocol

Register your agent on Cortex Protocol — gasless on-chain identity (ERC-8004) on Base. One command to get a verifiable agent identity.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: quriustus v1.0.0 3 files · 1 script body ≈ 706 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:90
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    - **Identity Registry:** `0xfB…54A`
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:102
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (placeholder value)
    -d '{"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0xfB…54A","data":"0x..."},"latest"],"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0"}'
    placeholder

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
  • 100Steps. 15 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 706 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 134: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill appears to do what it says, but it handles a blockchain private key and public registration details in ways users should review carefully before running.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026