BC AI Co-Founder Engine
AI co-founder that evaluates, scores, and builds startup ideas with structured thinking, validation, and GTM strategy
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, consistency
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (AI Co-Founder Engine) differs from the folder (ai-cofounder-engine)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 46 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 579 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 117: 120–800 characters recommended
- +4Structure: 2 headings, hard to scan
- +4No input/output examples
- -35 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 56.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill appears to be a startup strategy helper, but it may send raw business ideas or prompts to external research/search services without clear user disclosure.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026