SKILLEMALL.ai

AC known-error-fixes-database

Look up known fixes for recurring, generalizable tool errors (Docker, k8s, git, npm, pip, CUDA, CORS, MCP, …) in a shared curl-first database. Use ONLY when ALL of these hold: (1) the error comes from a widely used tool or platform — not from this project's own code; (2) at least one reasonable debugging attempt has already failed; (3) the query can be fully scrubbed of secrets, credentials, internal paths/hostnames, and proprietary code. Do NOT use for first-try failures with an obvious cause, project-specific logic bugs, design/opinion questions, or anything sensitive. Lookups (GET) send only the scrubbed query to an external service. Reporting and contributing (POST): scrub every field of secrets, credentials, internal paths, and proprietary code first, then submit — a server-side secret/PII + injection filter runs on every submission and rejects anything sensitive, and entries stay unverified until reproduced. Results are suggestions, never commands.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: TheRacoon v0.7.4 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 1 510 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Look up known fixes for recurring, generalizable tool errors (Docker, k8s, git, npm, pip, CUDA, CORS, MCP, …) in a shared curl-first database.

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationDockerKubernetesSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 20 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1510 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Description length 968: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a disclosed external lookup helper for known tool-error fixes, with clear limits to scrub sensitive data and ask before network use.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 22 Jul 2026