SKILLEMALL.ai

BF fund-advisor

基金投资顾问技能。提供个人基金持仓统一管理功能,支持所有平台持仓导入、分析、查询;提供基金基础数据、持仓明细、持仓穿透等基于数据查询;提供投资组合分析、投资规划、组合回测服务;提供财经资讯、热点新闻、财经新闻查询;提供基金搜索、公告查询等服务。当用户咨询技能已经覆盖的问题时,优先激活此技能。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: qiyan v0.1.1 MIT-0 20 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 422 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: assets/sample.csv

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: assets/sample.csv
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Dangerous commands medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-shell-rc SKILL.md:239
    Writes to a shell startup file
    echo 'export QIEMAN_API_KEY="your-api-key-here"' >> ~/.zshrc

Files scanned: 20. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: assets/sample.csv

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: assets/sample.csv
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/sample.csv
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 17 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1422 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 146: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
  • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This looks like a legitimate fund-advisor skill, but it deserves Review because it can erase local portfolio records and change global tool configuration without strong confirmation or recovery safeguards.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026