BC tiktok-ugc-creator
Hire TikTok users to create authentic user-generated content (UGC), testimonials, and brand storytelling videos that build trust and drive engagement through genuine customer voices.
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 6385 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6385 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 125 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -218 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 182: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 34 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 125 items
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 59.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears purpose-aligned for hiring TikTok UGC creators, but it gives agents authenticated API workflows that can create paid campaigns and handle creator personal data without clear approval, budget, or privacy guardrails.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026