SKILLEMALL.ai

AC cultural-tourism-wechat-feed

文旅公众号信息源 — 搜索文旅相关公众号热门文章,按阅读量筛选最火内容,生成精美 HTML 报告。当用户需要文旅公众号、旅游攻略、景区热度、文旅资讯、文旅爆款内容时使用。触发词:文旅公众号、文旅信息源、文旅资讯、旅游公众号、景区文章、文旅爆款。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: RedFox v1.0.1 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 611 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

文旅公众号信息源 — 搜索文旅相关公众号热门文章,按阅读量筛选最火内容,生成精美 HTML 报告。当用户需要文旅公众号、旅游攻略、景区热度、文旅资讯、文旅爆款内容时使用。触发词:文旅公众号、文旅信息源、文旅资讯、旅游公众号、景区文章、文旅爆款。

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsSoftware developmentData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 75Steps. 3 steps
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 611 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 122: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill does what it advertises, but its subscription mode creates persistent scheduled tasks and has unsafe handling of shell commands and API keys.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 23 Jul 2026