SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD douyin-top-account

抖音每日最具影响力账号榜单追踪分析工具；日榜每日17:30更新/回溯7天，周榜每周一17:30更新/回溯3周，月榜每月2号9点更新/回溯3月；当用户需要查询抖音账号排名、抖音日榜/周榜/月榜、抖音赛道TOP账号或下载榜单报告时使用

ClawHub Agent Skills author: RedFox v1.0.3 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 1 398 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 35 h ago

抖音每日最具影响力账号榜单追踪分析工具；日榜每日17:30更新/回溯7天，周榜每周一17:30更新/回溯3周，月榜每月2号9点更新/回溯3月；当用户需要查询抖音账号排名、抖音日榜/周榜/月榜、抖音赛道TOP账号或下载榜单报告时使用

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: douyin-top-account (ClawHub)

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "dependency"

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 18 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1398 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 115: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill’s main ranking and report features match its purpose, but it includes recurring subscription setup and automatic local report opening that need closer review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 2 Jun 2026