BF multi-content-feed
全网内容出海信息源 — 每日扫描全平台(公众号/抖音/视频号/小红书/快手/B站)内容出海爆款作品,按点赞量筛选Top50,智能聚类题材方向后生成包含平台标签、封面、互动数据与创作洞察的HTML日报。支持按平台、关键词、时间范围定向查询。⚠️数据每日15:00更新前一天数据,目标日期无数据时必须先告知用户并等待确认后才能调用接口,禁止自动获取。当用户需要内容出海日报、内容出海爆款、内容出海热点、内容出海创作趋势或自定义查询时使用。
全网内容出海信息源 —…
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: assets/default_cover.png
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcSKILL.md:62Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export REDFOX_API_KEY=ak_xxxxxxxx' >> ~/.zshrc
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/examples.md:267Writes to a shell startup file (test fixture / example file)echo 'export REDFOX_API_KEY=ak_xxxxxxxx' >> ~/.zshrc
fixture
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/default_cover.png
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/default_cover.png
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1727 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -221 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 217: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 38 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.