SKILLEMALL.ai

BF xiaohongshu-write

专为小红书内容创作打造的一站式笔记生成工具,基于全网每日持续收录的2000+条爆款笔记数据,根据用户输入关键词,精准检索查询平台当下热门爆款笔记,通过AI深度复盘爆款内容的结构、开头逻辑、干货密度与互动话术,提炼核心流量密码与创作要点,严格贴合小红书内容生态与传播逻辑,生成通顺、合规、可直接发布的完整笔记文案,降低创作门槛,高效产出流量内容。仅在主Agent中执行,不派发给子Agent。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: RedFox v1.0.1 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 404 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 28/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: noteLink, authorLink

GeneratorInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
28/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: noteLink, authorLink
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: xiaohongshu-write (ClawHub)

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: noteLink
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: authorLink

Process rating: all ten parameters 28/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: noteLink, authorLink
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: noteLink, authorLink
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (xiaohongshu-write) differs from the folder (xhs-copywriter-redfox)
  • 100Steps. 50 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1404 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 195: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 24 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 50 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches its stated Xiaohongshu copywriting purpose, but it needs review because it asks for personal writing samples and writes local report files without enough privacy and file-scope guardrails.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 2 Jun 2026