SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF personal-hooks

Structured continuity and follow-up skill for OpenClaw agents. Use when an agent needs to decide whether natural user dialogue should stay as casual chat, become staged memory, or become tracked follow-up with carryover, closure, cooldown, sleep/rest suppress, routine-aware wording, quiet-hours behavior, traceability, and release-grade frontstage safety guards. This package is not a generic cron sender. It uses context, causal state, and explicit lifecycle rules to decide whether care or follow-up should appear at all. It covers parked topics, watchful states, delegated tasks, sensitive events, candidate to incident to hook flow, /new carryover, deterministic onboarding/guided settings, and time-aware continuity guards. It does not include always-on idle/social nudging as a default feature.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Wakame v2.0.21 MIT-0 40 files · 1 script body ≈ 3 307 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 43/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/personal_hooks.py

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
43/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/personal_hooks.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 40. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/personal_hooks.py
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "os"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requires"

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/personal_hooks.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/personal_hooks.py
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (personal-hooks) differs from the folder (openclaw-continuity)
  • 100Steps. 130 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3307 tokens
  • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 801: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -35 of 6 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 130 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 18)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a real continuity skill, but it persists sensitive personal context and can schedule follow-ups with insufficient consent and scoping controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026