SKILLEMALL.ai

AC court-practice

Russian court practice (судебная практика РФ) via reputation.ru — find cases, get a synthesized analysis report, or fetch a document's full text across arbitration (арбитраж), general jurisdiction (СОЮ), and the Supreme Court (ВС РФ). Use for «найди практику по…», «как суды решают…», «обзор практики», «полный текст решения». Paid service — needs REPUTATION_API_KEY; if tools are missing or you get 401/403, do the Setup section first.

ClawHub Claude Code author: reputationru v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 3 961 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Russian court practice (судебная практика РФ) via reputation.ru — find cases, get a synthesized analysis report, or fetch a document's full text across…

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

AnalyzerInfrastructureData and analyticsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Consistency w 8
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requires"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "primaryEnv"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (court-practice) differs from the folder (reputation-courts-practice)
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 30 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3961 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 436: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +1License stated
    • +2Bilingual instructions (RU + EN)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a disclosed paid reputation.ru court-research integration that uses an API key and sends legal queries to that service, with no hidden or unrelated behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 4 Sept 2026