SKILLEMALL.ai

AB miraix-meme-court

Use this skill when the user wants to run Miraix Meme Court, shortlist Solana meme candidates, apply Rug Court safety and liquidity checks, approve one disciplined meme trade, prepare an unsigned payload when live Bitget execution is available, or check the status of a previously prepared order.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: richard7463 v0.1.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 957 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 78/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
78/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:18
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      - `walletAddress`: `AYY3…Geq`
      quoted
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:124
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - If prepare returns `prepared: false`, say unsigned payload generation is not available in the current live environment.

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 78/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 66 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 957 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 296: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 4 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 66 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This crypto-trading helper is mostly transparent, but it needs review because it can run implicitly, uses default trade inputs, and sends wallet and trade details to a third-party service.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026