SKILLEMALL.ai

BC x-tweet-fetcher

Fetch tweets, replies, and user timelines from X/Twitter without login or API keys. Also supports Chinese platforms (Weibo, Bilibili, CSDN, WeChat). Includes camofox_search() for zero-cost Google search without API keys. Basic tweet fetching: zero dependencies. Replies/timelines/search: requires Camofox. NEW: X-Tracker for tweet growth monitoring with burst detection.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: rightister v1.4.0 MIT-0 17 files body ≈ 2 034 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, failures and branches, consistency

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (x-tweet-fetcher) differs from the folder (rightister-x-tweet-fetcher)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 11 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2034 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -37 of 11 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 370: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 25 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (16 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a functional social-media fetching skill, but some paths use session cookies, SSH, and router command queues with weak user-facing controls, so it needs review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026