AC fitness-plan-flows
Design "training plan"-centric marketing flows for stores selling fitness accessories (resistance bands, elastic bands, yoga rings, foam rollers, massage balls, etc.)—post-purchase plan delivery, advancement plans for repurchase, challenges/plans for acquisition, and member-exclusive content. Trigger when users mention fitness accessories, resistance bands, elastic bands, training-plan bundles, buy-product-get-plan, post-purchase content, repurchase incentives, email/SMS flows, member-exclusive plans, or at-home fitness content operations. Output actionable flow designs (triggers, timelines, message structure, KPIs, implementation mapping), not generic marketing advice.
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting
How to improve
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 23 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1516 tokens
- medium 3 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 678: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.