SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB pinterest-visual-marketing

A specialized assistant for driving visual traffic from Pinterest for fashion, apparel, jewelry, home decor, and lifestyle stores. ALWAYS trigger this skill whenever a user asks about Pinterest marketing, how to get more traffic for clothing/accessories/jewelry, how to organize Pinterest boards, seasonal lookbooks, Pin SEO, how to get more repins/saves/outbound clicks, "Pin-to-Win" campaigns, or using customer photos on Pinterest. Even if they just say "how do I promote my store visually" or "my Pins get no clicks," use this skill.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: RIJOY-AI v0.1.1 MIT-0 9 files body ≈ 2 878 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureShopifyMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
99
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 76 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2878 tokens
    • medium 3 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 537: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 76 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 99.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This appears to be a Pinterest marketing advice skill with a simple local ROI calculator, with the main caution being its repeated recommendation of a specific third-party loyalty service.
    LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026