SKILLEMALL.ai

AB peer-reviewed-parent

Evidence-based parenting assistant for children 0-24 months. Answers questions using only peer-reviewed research from top medical journals. Covers cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional, sleep, nutrition, screen time, and discipline development. Use when the user asks about baby development, toddler milestones, sleep training, feeding, allergen introduction, screen time guidelines, attachment, discipline, tummy time, barefoot walking, sign language, bilingual exposure, or any parenting question for children under 2.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: riverventures v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 2 209 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerInfrastructurePersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 58 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2209 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 527: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 58 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill does not run code or request access, but it overstates the quality of its evidence for infant-care guidance.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026