BD 360Guard
360-degree comprehensive security review Skill. Use before installing any Skill from ClawHub, GitHub, or other sources. Performs full security scans including all Skill Vetter checks plus extended system/privacy/behavior checks and automated scanning scripts. Supports static analysis, behavior detection, dependency auditing.
As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 6
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 6
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityCHANGELOG.md:48Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- [x] Initiates reverse shell
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityCHANGELOG.md:155Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)• Reverse shell - scri…:15
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:99Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)• Initiates reverse shell (nc -e / bash -i)
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:166Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| ⛔ EXTREME | Persistence, root access, keylogging, reverse shell | **Refuse** |
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:304Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition){ pattern: /reverse.*shell|nc\s+-e|bash\s+-i/i, name: 'reverse shell' }detector
A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (360Guard) differs from the folder (360guard-skillvetter-upgrade-version)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4129 tokens
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 326: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 25 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (16 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.