SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC uplo-enterprise-it

AI-powered enterprise IT intelligence spanning DevOps, cybersecurity, and engineering. Unified search across infrastructure, security, and architecture documentation.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: RooJenkins v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 301 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
97
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 3

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 3
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security identity-patch.md:7
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      When presenting enterprise IT information, include system names, environment contexts, and relevant architecture diagrams or references. Map security controls to the specific systems they protect. For
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:12
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      Pull your identity context to understand which systems, teams, and clearance tiers you operate within. This determines whether you can access restricted infrastructure documentation like network topol
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:89
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - Respect classification tiers strictly in IT contexts. Network architecture diagrams, penetration test results, and API key rotation procedures are typically restricted. If your clearance does not co

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1301 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 166: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    No artifact-backed security concern was available, and the supplied scanner context reports no issues.
    LLM: benign (low) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026