CC auto-video-generator
Professional REAL demo video generation with PM-driven scenario decomposition and region-aware recording. Uses Playwright native recording + bmad-agent-pm integration for intelligent video production.
Professional REAL demo video generation with PM-driven scenario decomposition and region-aware recording.
As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokentemplates/basic/landing-page-saas/index.html:127High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)background: url("data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg width='60' height='60' viewBox='0 0 60 60' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%3E%3Cg fill='none' fill-rule='evenodd'%3E%3Cg fill='%23ffffff' fill-opacity='0.quoted
Files scanned: 40. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 200 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
description-no-whenneither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 6921 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 833): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 15 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6921 tokens
- 85Steps. 110 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- -255 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 200: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 37 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 110 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (22 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 55.