SKILLEMALL.ai

AB river-morphology-change

Extract shorelines, centerlines and channel widths from multi-temporal water body masks. Quantify shoreline migration, channel migration, change hotspots and migration zones. Use when analyzing river channel changes, identifying erosion/deposition areas, or generating river morphology reports.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ruiduobao v2.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 315 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Extract shorelines, centerlines and channel widths from multi-temporal water body masks.

As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency, progress reporting

IntegrationSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
68/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Consistency w 8
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (river-morphology-change) differs from the folder (geoskill-river-morphology-change)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 27 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1315 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 294: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is not evidently malicious, but it needs Review because it can make network downloads and persistent cache writes that are only partially disclosed, and a no-input run can produce demo analysis outputs.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 31 Jul 2026