AF garmin-panorama-training-analysis
基于佳明(Garmin Connect)数据的全景训练分析。拉取活动/逐公里明细(lapDTOs)/每日恢复(HRV·RHR·睡眠·Body Battery)/负荷平衡(ACWR·Form·就绪度),融合 Open-Meteo 天气,输出 Ride Relief 暗黑风格离线 HTML 报告。能力:逐公里技术分解(配速/心率/步频/步幅/垂直振幅/触地时间)、心率5区训练比例、热适应评价(WBGT/露点/湿球/酷热指数)、训练状态与成绩预测(Riegel)、身体成分与能量。触发词:佳明分析、Garmin 训练报告、跑步分析、周报月报、热适应、LSD分析、负荷分析、ACWR、就绪度、训练状态。
基于佳明(Garmin Connect)数据的全景训练分析。拉取活动/逐公里明细(lapDTOs)/每日恢复(HRV·RHR·睡眠·Body Battery)/负荷平衡(ACWR·Form·就绪度),融合 Open-Meteo 天气,输出 Ride Relief 暗黑风格离线 HTML…
As a process F 34/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/ride_relief_style.css, scripts/fetch_data.py::garmin_weather()
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/ride_relief_style.css - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/fetch_data.py::garmin_weather() - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "description_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "description_en" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
Process rating: all ten parameters 34/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/ride_relief_style.css, scripts/fetch_data.py::garmin_weather()
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4017 tokens
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 299: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 34 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +4Has examples (22 code blocks)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.