FC claw-news
智能每日新闻简报 Skill。支持两种新闻获取模式:(1) 主动搜索 - 基于用户关注的话题/关键词/人名,通过多 AI API 检索全网信息;(2) RSS 订阅 - 从配置的 RSS/Atom 源自动抓取新闻。 支持智能去重、兴趣管理、AI 摘要、定时推送。 触发关键词: "newsman", "新闻简报", "每日简报", "claw-news", "添加关注", "interest", "rss"
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.
The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Remove the critical guard findings (secrets, dangerous commands, hidden instructions): while they stand the skill is blocked and cannot grade above F.
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 8
-
critical Secrets in code
secret-openai-keyscripts/generate_digest.py:11OpenAI-style API key (quoted — discussed, not commanded)api_key='sk-k…m6x',
quoted
Medium and low: 7
-
medium Exfiltration
net-redirectable-api-keyrss/kimi_client.py:69Helper sends the API key to a host configured by an environment variable — the key can be redirected to another serverAPI key + configurable base URL from environment
-
medium Secrets in code
secret-labelled-tokenscripts/generate_digest.py:11Labelled token / key literal (vendor format unknown — verify it is not a live credential)api_key='sk-k…m6x',
-
medium Secrets in code
secret-openai-keytest_minimax.py:5OpenAI-style API key (test fixture / example file; quoted — discussed, not commanded)api_key = 'sk-c…aP8'
fixturequoted -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvREADME.md:17Reads a .env filecp .env.example .env
-
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literalscripts/generate_digest.py:11Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)api_key='sk-k…m6x',
-
low Secrets in code
secret-labelled-tokentest_minimax.py:5Labelled token / key literal (vendor format unknown — verify it is not a live credential) (test fixture / example file)api_key = 'sk-c…aP8'
fixture -
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literaltest_minimax.py:5Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example) (test fixture / example file)api_key = 'sk-c…aP8'
fixture
Files scanned: 33. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 17 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1267 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- -32 of 9 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 204: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 24 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 6)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.