SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF eda-spec2gds

Drive an open-source EDA workflow from spec to GDS using OpenClaw skills, workspace files, and CLI tools. Use when the user wants to turn a hardware spec into RTL, testbenches, synthesis results, OpenLane backend runs, GDS output, or report summaries; also use when creating, iterating, or auditing an AgentSkill for AI-driven chip design workflows.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Auther v1.0.1 MIT-0 52 files · 8 scripts body ≈ 1 931 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 52/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: assets/project-template/

ProcedureSoftware developmentInfrastructureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
94
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
52/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: assets/project-template/
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 6

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 6
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process references/SECURITY.md:53
    Starts a background / autostarted process (documentation of a security skill)
    sudo systemctl enable --now docker
    security skill
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/SECURITY.md:55
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    # Adds user to Docker group (privilege escalation potential)
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/SECURITY.md:93
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    1. **Docker Privilege Escalation**
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process references/ubuntu-24-setup.md:47
    Starts a background / autostarted process (documentation of a security skill)
    sudo systemctl enable --now docker
    security skill
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process scripts/bootstrap_eda_demo.sh:72
    Starts a background / autostarted process
    run_privileged systemctl enable --now docker
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process scripts/install_ubuntu_24_mvp.sh:23
    Starts a background / autostarted process
    sudo systemctl enable --now docker

Files scanned: 52. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: assets/project-template/

Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: assets/project-template/
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/project-template/
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 84 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1931 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -314 of 25 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 349: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 21 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 84 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 10)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly coherent for an EDA workflow, but it needs Review because its setup and preview paths can make privileged host changes and expose local artifacts over the network.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026