BF Signal-Search
答案质量层搜索/增强检索 skill:搜信息、做调研、对比、查资料、信源比对、事实核查时启用。不做链接列表——返回带加权打分(SBA)、事实级来源锚定(M51)、分层深度(L0–L3)与 token 预算封顶的干净答案;无广告、零 key、可嵌入,被其它 skill 当检索原语调用(由调用方注入 LLM 与抓取能力)。
答案质量层搜索/增强检索 skill:搜信息、做调研、对比、查资料、信源比对、事实核查时启用。不做链接列表——返回带加权打分(SBA)、事实级来源锚定(M51)、分层深度(L0–L3)与 token 预算封顶的干净答案;无广告、零 key、可嵌入,被其它 skill 当检索原语调用(由调用方注入 LLM 与抓取能力)。
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: examples/agent_dispatch.py, references/tier-policy.md, references/intent-decomposition.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenconfig.json:602High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"model": "para…-v2"
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/embed.py:6High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)模型默认 para…-v2(中文友好,多语语义);可在 config.embed.model
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/embed.py:21High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)_DEFAULT_MODEL = "para…-v2"
quoted
Files scanned: 39. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/agent_dispatch.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/tier-policy.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/intent-decomposition.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/token-optimization.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/conflict_llm.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/*.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/*.py
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
- 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: examples/agent_dispatch.py, references/tier-policy.md, references/intent-decomposition.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 40 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1854 tokens
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The skill ranks results itself: that belongs to the system behind the tool, not the model
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- -327 of 30 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 160: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 3)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 53.