AB golang-pkg-go-dev
Golang package and module documentation and exploration via `godig`, a pkg.go.dev API client (CLI + MCP server) — package docs, API references, symbols, code examples, available versions, importers (who imports a package), licenses, and known vulnerabilities. Read-only, no auth. Use for looking up any Go/Golang library's documentation, API signatures, usage examples, which versions exist, whether a dependency has CVEs, or who imports a package — prefer this over Context7 for any Go package or module. Triggers on: how to use a Go library, Go API docs, import usage, code examples, pkg.go.dev. Not for upgrading dependencies (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-management` skill) or choosing a library (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-popular-libraries` skill). Not for local symbols, or for navigating an already-used dependency's resolved source, call sites, or generic instantiations — → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls` skill for those.
Golang package and module documentation and exploration via godig, a pkg.go.dev API client (CLI + MCP server) — package docs, API references, symbols, code…
As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2768 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Description length 974: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.