BF stock-daily-analysis
LLM驱动的每日股票分析系统完整版 v2.1。支持A股/港股/美股智能分析、决策仪表盘、大盘复盘、板块分析、Agent问股、多渠道推送。提供技术面+基本面综合分析。触发词:股票分析、分析股票、每日分析、大盘复盘、板块分析、问股。
As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: LICENSE
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
medium Exfiltration
exfil-webhook-urlscripts/notifier.py:379Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)url = f"https://api.telegram.org/bot{token}/sendMessage"quoted -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvscripts/run.sh:24Reads a .env file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)echo "请执行: cd $PROJECT_DIR && cp .env.example .env"
quoted -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvscripts/setup.sh:49Reads a .env file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)echo " 2. cp .env.example .env"
quoted -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvscripts/update.sh:22Reads a .env filecp .env .env.backup.$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)
Files scanned: 20. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: LICENSE
Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: LICENSE
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (stock-daily-analysis) differs from the folder (stock-daily-analysis-v2)
- 100Steps. 17 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1259 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 114: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -255 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -33 of 14 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 58.