AC contract-review-agent
Contract clause analysis, risk flagging, renewal tracking, and obligation extraction for business agreements. Use when you need to review vendor contracts, service agreements, NDAs, SaaS subscriptions, or client engagement letters — identifying risky clauses, extracting key obligations, building renewal calendars, and generating executive summaries. Supports PDF and text input. NOT for legal advice, litigation strategy, or drafting new contracts from scratch (use a legal drafting tool for that). NOT for highly specialized agreements (M&A, securities, complex IP licensing) where licensed attorney review is mandatory.
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 52 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2081 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 623: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 22 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 52 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.